I prefer the second image, the tones seem more real. You chose the second one (I think) what was the purpose of the sunrise/sunset experiment? I also prefer the wording on the second image but then I'm used to the those words so my opinion is perhaps less 'pure'.
Interesting to see the original image of the tree, that's some very impressive ps work Spencer.
The artists’ creation of a ‘true self-portrait’ is bound up in meanings of self-hood and individuation; by means of his/her practice becoming a method of developing the artists’ need for self-discovery. Through this self-exploration, the artefact becomes an attempt to reveal something of the artist, a therapeutic tool perhaps, by which the photograph is used as a form of depth psychology.
A mixed methodology of autoethnography and thematic analysis is undertaken of the language of response – language generated from the viewing of purely visual data – to examine and record patterns or themes within this information that is relevant to the research question. Through this form of removed analysis - the interpretation of the photograph and not the artist - can a new internal world of the artist be revealed? Is there a particular reading that could be universalised or is this unique to me? Or is the analysis a series of projections, a more of an understanding of the readers?
The concerns of this thesis are with the ways in which the production of these photographs and their reception can be incorporated into an art practice and a new self-portrait is revealed.
I prefer the second image, the tones seem more real. You chose the second one (I think) what was the purpose of the sunrise/sunset experiment? I also prefer the wording on the second image but then I'm used to the those words so my opinion is perhaps less 'pure'.
ReplyDeleteInteresting to see the original image of the tree, that's some very impressive ps work Spencer.
Andrew K